Information about the article

Article type:
Original article

Index UDK: 340.11

Year, Volume, Number:
2025, Vol. 13, № 3 (51)

Pages: 24-32

Official judicial interpretation as a form of law development

Ekaterina S. Zaitseva
Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 1 Letchika Pilyutova street, St. Petersburg, 198206, Russia, elena_zazolina@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0688-2967

EDN: EFONVM
DOI: 10.21685/2307-9525-2025-13-3-3

Category: THEORETICAL AND HISTORICAL LEGAL SCIENCES

For citation:
Zaitseva E.S. Official judicial interpretation as a form of law development. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal "Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo" = Electronic scientific journal "Science. Society. State". 2025;13(3):24–32. (In Russ.). doi:10.21685/2307-9525-2025-13-3-3

...................................

Received: 17.06.2025

Accepted: 30.07.2025
.......................................

Open access

Abstract
Background. Official interpretation carried out by the highest judicial authorities is essential for improving the current legislation. Despite the fact that initially the decisions of the highest judicial authorities are aimed at improving the quality and uniformity of law enforcement practice, one cannot ignore their role and significance as a form of development of the current positive law. The purpose of the work is to establish the meaning and determine the characteristic features of a special form of development of law in the form of interpretation by the highest judicial authorities of the Russian Federation. Materials and methods. The study used general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, abstraction, analogy, system-structural, etc.) and specific scientific methods (comparative legal, formal legal, method of interpreting legal norms, etc.). Results. Based on the analysis of the features of official interpretation as a form of legal development, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation have made the following generalizations. It is concluded that the possibility and necessity of developing law in the process of interpretative activity of the highest judicial authorities are conditioned by uncertainty as one of the properties of law. Interpretation of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is a form of development of law, since, firstly, it determines the strategy of development and improvement of legislation; secondly, it helps to eliminate legislative imbalance in a particular area of legal regulation. Official interpretation of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation can be considered as a form of development of law in three cases: when filling legal lacunae (gaps); absence of expressed will of the legislator on a specific issue; creation of a generalization and subsequent isolation of a general rule to clarify the current legal norm in the presence of a number of similar law enforcement acts. Conclusions. Interpretation carried out by the highest judicial authorities can be considered as a form of legal development, since the provisions contained in their interpretative acts change the current legal regulation and determine the guidelines for further lawmaking activities, linking the provisions of the law with reality. The results of official judicial interpretation are a necessary feedback channel for the legislator, since it is precisely with its help that newly emerging problems of public life are taken into account.

Keywords
official interpretation, higher courts, development of law, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

References

1. Kolokolov N.A. Should “judicial practices” in criminal proceedings be rejected or, having streamlined them, legalized? Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo: ponyatie, soderzhanie, istochniki: materialy nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyashchennoy 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya prof. D.S. Kareeva (g. Moskva, 23–24 marta 2006 g) = Criminal-procedural law: concept, content, sources: proceedings of scientific-practical conference, held on the 100th anniversary of professor D.S. Kareev (Moscow, March 23–24, 2006). Moscow: Gorodets, 2006:66–68. (In Russ.)

2. Kulikov M.A. Manipulation of goals and means in legal regulation: problems of theory and practice: DSc dissertation. Moscow, 2023:412. (In Russ.)

3. Vas'kovskiy E.V. Tsivilisticheskaya metodologiya. Uchenie o tolkovanii i primenenii grazhdanskikh zakonov = Civilistic methodology. The doctrine of interpretation and application of civil laws. Moscow: Tsentr YurInfoR, 2002:507. (In Russ.)

4. Vlasenko N.A. Problemy pravovoy neopredelennosti: kurs lektsiy = Problems of legal uncertainty: lecture course. Moscow: In-t zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2015:174. (In Russ.)

5. Vlasenko N.A. Uncertainty in law: concept and research paths. Rossiyskoe pravosudie = Russian justice. 2006;(7):4–12. (In Russ.)

6. Timoshina E.V., Kraevskiy A.A. Criteria for the normativity of interpretative legal acts in Russian judicial practice. Pravoprimenenie = Law enforcement. 2022;6(24):220–243. (In Russ.). doi: 10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).220-243

7. Luchin V.O. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Problemy realizatsii = Constitution of the Russian Federation. Problems of implementation. Moscow: YuNITI, 2012:687. (In Russ.)

8. Shindyapina E.D. Analogy of law in law enforcement: PhD abstract. Moscow, 2007:24. (In Russ.)

9. Kononov A.L. Right to a dissenting opinion. Zakon = Law. 2006;(11):43–46. (In Russ.)

10. Belousov S.A. Legislative imbalance (doctrine, theory, practice): DSc abstract. Saratov, 2016:67. (In Russ.)

11. Savel'eva O.A. Resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation: role in criminal proceedings. Mirovoy sud'ya = Justice of the Peace. 2006;(2):27–32. (In Russ.)

12. Momotov V.V. Interpretation of legal norms by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the context of the modern legal system (end). Gosudarstvo i parvo = State and law. 2018;(5):30–36. (In Russ.). doi: 10.7868/S0132076918050037

13. Kalinin V.N. Resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as sources of civil law. Aktual'nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava = Current issues of civil law. 2016;(1):53–62. (In Russ.)

14. Senyakin I.N., Zheldybina T.A. The role of judicial practice in the mechanism of lawmaking. Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal = Leningrad Law Journal. 2014;(4):135–152. (In Russ.)

15. Anishina V.I. et al. Samostoyatel'nost' i nezavisimost' sudebnoy vlasti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya = Autonomy and independence of the judiciary of the Russian Federation: monograph. Moscow: Yurist", 2006:493. (In Russ.)

16. Shul'ga I.V. Legal nature of reviews of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Rossiyskiy sud'ya = Russian judge. 2006;(9):7–9. (In Russ.)

17. Kornev A.V. Clarifications of the higher courts on issues of judicial practice as a form of judicial lawmaking in Russia: PhD abstract. Moscow, 2016:22. (In Russ.)

18. Germer V.N., Ivanov S.A. Interpretative acts of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the system of legal regulation. Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti = Herald of Economic Security. 2023;(1):53–56. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24412/2414-3995-2023-1-53-56

19. Vereshchagin A.N., Karapetov A.G., Tay Yu.V. Ways to improve the law-making activities of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii = Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2013;(6):4–81. (In Russ.)

20. Pobedkin A.V. Resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as a form of interpretation and overcoming gaps in criminal procedural law. Gosudarstvo i parvo = State and law. 2008;(11):36–44. (In Russ.)

21. Zaloilo M.V. Legality and expediency in postmodern society: reconsidering the established classical model. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava = Russian Law Journal. 2020;(6):22–37. (In Russ.). doi: 10.12737/jrl.2020.065

22. Chernogor N.N., Zaloilo M.V. Aktual'nye problemy pravotvorchestva = Current issues of lawmaking. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya firma «Kontrakt», 2018:144. (In Russ.)

23. Grebnev R.D. The role and place of judicial acts in the law-making process. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya = Journal of foreign legislation and comparative law. 2020;(2):23–35. (In Russ.). doi: 10.12737/jflcl.2020.008

24. Vasil'eva T.A. Judicial lawmaking in the Russian Federation. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva = Bulletin of the Volga University named after V.N. Tatishchev. 2009;(70):45–60. (In Russ.)

25. Zagaynova S.K. Sudebnyy pretsedent: problemy pravoprimeneniya = Judicial precedent: problems of law enforcement. Moscow: Norma, 2002:167. (In Russ.)

Дата создания: 22.09.2025 12:00
Дата обновления: 22.09.2025 18:16